Skip to main content
· 6/12/1953

United States v. Majia

Citations

  • 2 C.M.A. 616
  • 2 USCMA 616
  • 10 C.M.R. 114
  • 1953 CMA LEXIS 814
  • 1953 WL 1784

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Both Camero and Jarett involved regulations which called for evidentiary-type hearings [not available in this case]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bkosman, Latimer, Quinn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.