Skip to main content
· 8/27/2009

United States v. Main

Citations

  • 579 F.3d 200
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 19242
  • 2009 WL 2616251

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that where a defendant’s “sentence was ‘based on’ his Rule 11(c)(1)(C
  • “[W]e agree with the district court that Main in fact was sentenced ‘based on’ his Rule 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement.” (emphasis supplied)
  • “We review de novo the determination of whether [a defendant’s] sentence was ‘based on a sentencing range that was subsequently lowered by the Sentencing Commission,’ because this determination is a matter of statutory interpretation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walker, Wallace

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.