· 8/27/2009
United States v. Main
Citations
- 579 F.3d 200
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 19242
- 2009 WL 2616251
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that where a defendant’s “sentence was ‘based on’ his Rule 11(c)(1)(C
- “[W]e agree with the district court that Main in fact was sentenced ‘based on’ his Rule 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement.” (emphasis supplied)
- “We review de novo the determination of whether [a defendant’s] sentence was ‘based on a sentencing range that was subsequently lowered by the Sentencing Commission,’ because this determination is a matter of statutory interpretation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walker, Wallace
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.