United States v. Mahmoud Safari

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing appointment of Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney who prosecuted state case as Special Assistant United States Attorney for federal prosecution of same defendant as “a function of the executive branch” without mentioning Bartkus exception
• state prosecutor's appointment as Special Assistant United States Attorney subsequent to state court action does not retroactively make United States party to earlier state court proceeding
• state prosecutor’s appointment as Special Assistant United States Attorney subsequent to state court action does not retroactively make United States party to earlier state court proceeding
• jurors not well-versed in specifics of drug dealing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).