· 10/25/2017
United States v. Magwood
Citations
- 699 F. App'x 262
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Accordingly, in the wake of Analytical Diagnostics, class-of-one claims are not ipso facto barred simply because the government’s conduct was discretionary”
- lots with less percentage of variance from the requirement and lots already in existence at time of seeking construction variance are not virtually identical
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harris, Keenan, Wynn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.