Skip to main content
· 10/25/2017

United States v. Magwood

Citations

  • 699 F. App'x 262

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Accordingly, in the wake of Analytical Diagnostics, class-of-one claims are not ipso facto barred simply because the government’s conduct was discretionary”
  • lots with less percentage of variance from the requirement and lots already in existence at time of seeking construction variance are not virtually identical

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris, Keenan, Wynn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.