Skip to main content
· 10/31/2014

United States v. Madhatta Haipe

Citations

  • 413 U.S. App. D.C. 101
  • 769 F.3d 1189
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 20835
  • 2014 WL 5487611

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defense counsel correctly “acknowledged in the district court that the issue of time served was to be addressed by the Attorney General through the Bureau of Prisons”
  • explaining that a \properly calculated range frames the district court's exercise of its discretion\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Kavanaugh, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.