· 10/31/2014
United States v. Madhatta Haipe
Citations
- 413 U.S. App. D.C. 101
- 769 F.3d 1189
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 20835
- 2014 WL 5487611
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that defense counsel correctly “acknowledged in the district court that the issue of time served was to be addressed by the Attorney General through the Bureau of Prisons”
- explaining that a \properly calculated range frames the district court's exercise of its discretion\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers, Kavanaugh, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.