United States v. Madeline Maxwell and Walter Archibald Younge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on this language in a prior version of the HEA in conclud- ing that student-aid funds paid to an institution remained federal funds
• pointing to the government’s “reversionary interest” in student-aid funds in concluding that such funds remain federal funds
• statute indicates congressional intent that United States retain “financial interest” in property
• because U.S retained “ rever­ sionary interest” in SEOG funds, such funds constituted “ money, or thing of value o f the United States” for purposes of federal criminal statute prohibiting theft or conversion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).