United States v. Mack Stephenson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The primary inquiry in determining the applicability of Park laws to a given area must therefore be whether that area is within the statutory boundaries of the Park, not whether [the Park Service] holds title to the land in question.”
• construing predecessor to 54 U.S.C. § 100101

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dunn-McCampbell Royalty Interest, Inc. v. National Park Service
  Fifth Circuit· 2011-01-07· cited 38×
• Dunn McCampbell Royalty Interest, Inc. v. National Park Service
  S.D. Texas· 1995-06-20· cited 10×
• High Point, LLLP v. National Park Service
  Eleventh Circuit· 2017-03-08· cited 7×
• Hooks v. Forman, Holt, Eliades & Ravin, LLC
  Second Circuit· 2013-06-11
• United States v. Parker
  W.D. North Carolina· 2014-08-01