United States v. Lynn F. Schmitz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that inaccuracies of an affiant’s testimony regarding the details of an incident did not undermine probable cause where the affiant reasonably concluded that she had observed a crime in progress
• stating that Franks does not apply to negligent misrepresentations
• stating that Franks does not apply to negligent misrepresentations
• “A lawful search extends to all areas and containers in which the object of the search may be found.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).