United States v. Lyman Wagers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a defendant's prior conviction for child pornography was \relevant\ to determination of probable cause
• holding that “evidence that a person has visited or subscribed to websites containing child pornography supports the conclusion that he has likely downloaded, kept, and otherwise possessed the material.”
• agreeing that “evidence that a person has visited or subscribed to websites containing child pornography supports the conclusion that he has likely downloaded, kept, or possessed the material”
• stating that viewing child pornography is “much more tied to a place of privacy” and “seclusion”
• stating that viewing child pornography is “much more tied to a place of privacy” and “seclusion”
• noting that “evidence that a person has visited or subscribed to websites containing child pornography supports the conclusion that he has likely downloaded, kept, and otherwise possessed the material”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).