Skip to main content
· 4/20/1953

United States v. LV No. 134

Citations

  • 14 F.R.D. 261
  • 1953 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3837

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiff justified in suspending medical expert discovery during settlement negotiations and pending defendant’s summary judgment motion
  • psychiatrist’s deposition testimony “did not so contradict his written report or his testimony at trial as to mislead” other party regarding expert opinion rendered at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dimock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.