United States v. Luther Wilkins, Morris Lewis, and Sam Gates, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant “in withdrawing his motion to suppress waived any objection to the admission of the statement”
• holding that evidence that defendant was under influence of injected drugs at time of questioning was overridden by nurse = s testimony that defendant appeared coherent
• stating that “[t]he getaway is part of the robbery; therefore, the driver of the getaway car is a principal in the crime of robbery and not a mere accomplice after the fact.”
• stating that “[t]he getaway is part of the robbery; therefore, the driver of the getaway car is a principal in the crime of robbery and not a mere accomplice after the fact.”
• stating that “[t]he getaway is part of the robbery . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).