United States v. Lusk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that limiting instruction mitigated risk of a Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause8 violation that members would substantively consider hearsay upon which expert relied to reach his opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Crawford v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
• Richardson v. Marsh
  Supreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 2,670×
• United States v. Harcrow
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2008-03-13· cited 188×
• Sims v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 73×
• United States v. Blazier
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2010-12-01· cited 67×
• United States v. Zack Vance Sims
  Ninth Circuit· 1975-04-02· cited 50×
• United States v. Grant C. Affleck
  Tenth Circuit· 1985-11-07· cited 43×
• Henry Adamson v. Ronald Cathel
  Third Circuit· 2011-03-01· cited 31×
• United States v. Neeley
  United States Court of Military Appeals· 1987-09-28· cited 24×

Other cases named United States v. Lusk

8 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• United States v. Lusk
  U.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1985-12-24· cited 3×
• United States v. Lusk
  Fourth Circuit· 1978-01-27
• United States v. Lusk
  Fifth Circuit· 1987-11-19
• United States v. Lusk
  Fifth Circuit· 1995-06-27
• United States v. Lusk
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-07-24
• United States v. Lusk
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2011-03-17
• United States v. Lusk
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2011-03-25
• United States v. Lusk
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2012-11-28