Skip to main content
· 9/12/1986

United States v. Lulac, Gi Forum and Naacp, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees v. State of Texas

Citations

  • 793 F.2d 636

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • there is no duty for higher education to compensate for constitutional infirmities at secondary/primary levels
  • there is no duty for higher education to compensate for constitutional infirmities at secondary/primary levels
  • “When the legislature enacts a law, or a state agency adopts a regulation, that affects a general class of persons, all of those persons have received procedural due process by the legislative process itself and they have no right to individual attention”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thornberry, Rubin, Jolly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.