United States v. Luke Goodon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in relying on a certified copy of a conviction as proof that the defendant violated state law
• explaining that a defendant “has a limited due process right in connection with [a] revocation hearing” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).