United States v. Luis G. Leon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court lacks jurisdiction to consider a request for an extension of time to file a § 2255 motion until the prisoner actually files such a motion
• concluding that this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider an appeal of the denial of a motion to submit an untimely petition that was filed in the absence of an actual § 2255 petition
• holding 11 that a federal court lacks jurisdiction to consider the timeliness of a § 2255 petition 12 until a petition is actually filed
• finding that a district court lacks jurisdiction to consider the timeliness of a petition until the petition is actually filed because there is no case or controversy to be heard, and any opinion would be merely advisory
• federal court lacks jurisdiction to consider request to extend time to file motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255
• federal court lacks jurisdiction to consider the timeliness of habeas petition until a petition is actually filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).