Skip to main content
· 11/19/1991

United States v. Luis Blas

Citations

  • 947 F.2d 1320
  • 1991 WL 235727

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding testimony incredible as a matter of law where it was physically impossible for the witness to have observed what he or she claims to have witnessed
  • testimony is incredible if it was “physically impossible for the witness to observe that which he or she claims occurred, or impossible under the laws of nature”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Easterbrook, Ripple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.