United States v. Luis Albert Gillespie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that evidence of defendant’s homosexuality neither proved nor disproved that he committed child molestation
• finding error in admitting testimony of clinical psychologist on characteristics common to child molesters, where defendant never put general character at issue or offered testimony of specific character traits that rendered him incapable of molesting a female child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).