United States v. Luis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “under the majority rule, and the rule established by the Ninth Circuit in LaVine, the geographic origin of the speech is not material”
• finding insufficient disruption when a student posted a video to YouTube in which several students made derogatory, sexual, and profanity-laced statements about a classmate
• “addressing] the concerns of an upset parent and a student who temporarily refused to go to class,” as well as causing five students to miss an undetermined portion of one school day did not rise to the level of a substantial disruption
• “[T]he contours of, a student’s First Amendment right to make a potentially defamatory and degrading video about a classmate, which is almost immediately thereafter brought to the School’s attention, are not clearly established.”
• prior relationship could support prediction of an adverse occurrence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).