United States v. Luebs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the accused may rely on a stipulation of fact and defense counsel’s advice “rather than independent recollection” of the facts underlying the offense charged during the providence inquiry
• holding that the accused may rely on a 14 United States v. Jones, No. 08-0335/NA stipulation of fact and defense counsel’s advice “rather than independent recollection” of the facts underlying the offense charged during the providence inquiry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).