United States v. Lucky Irorere

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “‘[M]erely submitting instructions is not sufficient’ to preserve an objection.” (quoting United States v. Doug- las, 818 F.2d 1317, 1322 (7th Cir. 1987))
• “‘[M]erely submitting instructions is not sufficient’ to preserve an objection.” (quoting United States v. Doug- las, 818 F.2d 1317, 1322 (7th Cir. 1987))
• “‘[M]erely submitting instructions is not sufficient’ to preserve an objection.” (quoting United States v. Doug- las, 818 F.2d 1317, 1322 (7th Cir. 1987))
• “‘[M]erely submitting instructions is not sufficient’ to preserve an objection.” (quoting United States v. Doug- las, 818 F.2d 1317, 1322 (7th Cir. 1987))
• “[A] defendant is only entitled to such an instruction when his theory of defense is not already adequately captured by the prof- fered instructions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).