United States v. Lowell Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding evidence was sufficient to prove that defendant knowingly received child pornography in light of “his solicitation of child pornography as expressed in his letter and other correspondence”
• where defendant had received different child pornography than requested, the statute does not require that recipient of child pornography know precise contents of material received, but need only know that material is child pornography

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).