United States v. Louper-Morris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the MVRA \requires individuals who are convicted of wire fraud to pay restitution to their victims\ (citations omitted)
• determining that individuals who forged signatures on power-of-attorney forms for the purpose of receiving tax credits were participants under § 3B1.1
• affirming mail and wire fraud convictions involving scheme to defraud Minnesota of education tax credits
• reviewing a restitution order for plain error where the defendant did not object at sentencing
• finding no double recovery and affirming criminal restitution order when defendant conceded that victim had not yet received any payments pursuant to a civil judgment
• affirming application of the sophisticated-means enhancement to a \vast marketing scheme\ using, among other things, a website

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).