United States v. Louise Irene Schemenauer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to address the question of whether § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii) requires that the offense be done for the purpose of financially benefitting the defendant herself
• “No explanation for Schemenauer’s participation in a revenue-producing scheme was suggested other than an intent to share in the payments to be made.”
• “No explanation for Schemenauer’s participation in a revenue-producing scheme was suggested other than an intent to share in the payments to be made.”
• ‘We ... view the evidence in the light most favorable to the government and ask whether it is quite clear that no reasonable juror could have found the elements of each charge beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).