United States v. Louis Ziskin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no double jeopardy violation because defendant was indicted on two separate yet similar conspiracies and not one overarching conspiracy
• “[S]ome interrelationship between conspiracies does not necessarily make them the same criminal enterprise.” (quoting United States v. Guzman, 852 F.2d 1117, 1121 (9th Cir. 1988))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).