United States v. Louis Sauza-Martinez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plain error affected the defendant’s substantial rights where the evidence against him “was by no means overwhelming”
• reversing for plain error where the district court failed sua sponte to provide a limiting instruction that certain evidence was admissible only as to co-defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).