United States v. Louis R. Hoog

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant “lur[ing] or entic[ing]” the victims “by false promises” “to stay in the vehicle” was sufficient for a kidnapping conviction
• holding that when kidnapper induces accompaniment with an accomplice by false pretenses, vic- tims are inveigled or decoyed under the Act
• evidence legally sufficient to show kidnapping by inveiglement where the appellant induced the respective victims into accepting a ride in his truck by false pretenses and to stay in the ve- hicle during its “roundabout course into Kansas” against their own will

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).