United States v. Louis J. Wesela

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating timing of statement important but not controlling and that what matters is whether statement made “contemporaneously with the excitement resulting from the event, not necessarily with the event itself”
• finding no Edwards viola‐ tion, however, because suspect then reinitiated conver‐ sation
• finding no Edwards viola‐ tion, however, because suspect then reinitiated conver‐ sation
• finding no Edwards viola‐ tion, however, because suspect then reinitiated conver‐ sation
• “[W]hether a search was within the boundaries of consent is determined according to the ‘totality of all the circumstances.’”
• \[W]hether a search was within the boundaries of consent is determined according to the 'totality of all the circumstances. '\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).