United States v. Louis Guglielmi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that only an en banc court, not a subsequent panel, has authority to overturn a previous panel's published decision
• holding that only an en banc court, not a subsequent panel, has authority to overturn a previous panel’s published decision
• noting that only an en banc court may overturn a previous panel's published decision
• defining prurient interest as appealing to those “individuals eager for a forbidden look”
• where sentence is less than life in prison, no review of proportionality of sentence to crime is required
• in por- nography case, court refused to ask questions relating to jurors' per- sonal reactions to specific sexual activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).