United States v. Louis Defazio, 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that information is not privileged simply because it comes from an attorney
• a district court’s decision regarding disqualification of counsel is reviewed for an abuse of discretion
• “Communications from attorney to client are privileged only if they constitute legal advice, or tend directly or indirectly to reveal the substance of a client confidence.”
• “Communications from attorney to 17 client are privileged only if they constitute legal advice, or tend directly or indirectly 18 to reveal the substance of a client confidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).