· 4/4/2002
United States v. Louis B. Oberhauser
Citations
- 284 F.3d 827
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 6064
- 2002 WL 500642
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a motion for a new trial must be based on \newly discovered evidence\ that was not available to counsel before trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McMillian, Fagg, Riley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.