Skip to main content
· 4/4/2002

United States v. Louis B. Oberhauser

Citations

  • 284 F.3d 827
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 6064
  • 2002 WL 500642

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a motion for a new trial must be based on \newly discovered evidence\ that was not available to counsel before trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMillian, Fagg, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.