Skip to main content
· 5/13/1991

United States v. Lorince

Citations

  • 773 F. Supp. 1082
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6476
  • 1991 WL 185143

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Thus, the statute of limitations could be tolled as to the appellant only if the bank, in applying his wife’s account to the note, had acted as his authorized agent in doing so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ilana Diamond Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.