United States v. Lorie Westerfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an error exceeding $200,000 in the amount of the loss would be harmless because the offense level would remain the same and the possibility of an effect on the sentence would involve baseless conjecture
• “If the jury found … defendant had a strong suspicion that things were not what they seemed … yet shut her eyes … the jury could conclude [she] acted with the necessary intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).