Skip to main content
· 11/27/1987

United States v. Lorenzo Yancey

Citations

  • 827 F.2d 83

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \we are persuaded by the [amendment] that the Probation Act was never intended to limit revocation authority to the period of probation\
  • “There can be no challenge to the adequacy of counsel unless there is an underlying right to counsel in a particular proceeding.”
  • “There can be no challenge to the adequacy of counsel unless there is an underlying right to counsel in a particular proceeding.”
  • “There can be no challenge to the adequacy of counsel unless there is an underlying right to counsel in a particular proceeding.”
  • probation revoked for acts committed while defendant was in prison

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Cudahy, Easterbrook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.