· 11/27/1987
United States v. Lorenzo Yancey
Citations
- 827 F.2d 83
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \we are persuaded by the [amendment] that the Probation Act was never intended to limit revocation authority to the period of probation\
- “There can be no challenge to the adequacy of counsel unless there is an underlying right to counsel in a particular proceeding.”
- “There can be no challenge to the adequacy of counsel unless there is an underlying right to counsel in a particular proceeding.”
- “There can be no challenge to the adequacy of counsel unless there is an underlying right to counsel in a particular proceeding.”
- probation revoked for acts committed while defendant was in prison
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Cudahy, Easterbrook
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.