United States v. Lorenzo Hernandez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the injury that a plaintiff alleges must 25 be unique to that plaintiff, one in which he has a ‘personal stake’ in the 26 outcome of a litigation seeking to remedy that harm”
• declining to consider the government's new legal argument on appeal when \the government did not present this argument to the district court\
• finding that two suits did not 20 arise out the same transactional nucleus of facts where 21 the first action was predicated on the plaintiff’s 22 layoff from work and the second action was predicated on 23 the union’s refusal to return the plaintiff to work
• “Evidence is not ‘substantial’ if vital testimony has been conjured out of whole cloth.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).