United States v. Lorenzo Harris-Thompson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it excluded as cumulative a lengthy, forty-five- minute video
• “[I]t is well settled that a poll under [Criminal] Rule 31(d) is not required unless requested and is waived if the request is not timely.” (alterations in original) (quoting Hiland, 909 F.2d at 1138–39)
• claim defendant was under the influence of drugs and alcohol not a “fair and just” reason to withdraw plea when it contradicted plea agreement, state‐ ments at time of arrest, and testimony during plea hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).