United States v. Lorenz Vilim Karlic

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the incorrect application of the guidelines requires remand so that the district court may properly exercise its discretion
• attempting to damage property used in inter- state commerce in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(i) and using an ex- plosive in attempting to rob a bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(h)
• attempting to damage property used in inter- state commerce in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(i) and using an ex- plosive in attempting to rob a bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(h)
• defendant was aware that neighboring residents were practically certain to be present during time of explosion, and that people did in fact use depositories located in the building to be destroyed, even in the middle of the night
• defendant was aware that neighboring residents were practically certain to be present during time of explosion, and that people did in fact use depositories located in the building to be destroyed, even in the middle of the night
• enhancement may apply even where no one was injured

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).