Skip to main content
· 4/10/2008

United States v. Lopez-Matias

Citations

  • 522 F.3d 150
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 7662
  • 2008 WL 1013792

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the government's failure to follow \death penalty protocols\ in manual did not, alone, create a basis to dismiss its notice of intent to seek death sentence
  • holding that the U.S. Attorneys’ Manual, predecessor to the Justice Manual, did not give rise to substantive rights and that its violation was insufficient to give rise to sanctions
  • concluding United States Attorneys’ Manual on death penalty protocols did not confer substantive rights
  • holding internal DOJ policy “not man- dated by statute or the constitution” does not confer substan- tive rights
  • concluding United States Attorneys’ Manual on death penalty protocols did not confer substantive rights
  • noting that \legal error is a per se abuse of discretion\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lipez, Howard, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.