United States v. Lonson Jaa Luloff, United States of America v. Lonson Jaa Luloff, United States of America v. Lonson Jaa Luloff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an immunity agreement limited to Title 21 drug offenses was not violated when the defendant was charged with unlawfully possessing a gun, a non-drug offense, based on testimony provided pursuant to the immunity agreement
• holding that an immunity agreement limited to Title 21 drug offenses was not violated when the defendant was charged with unlawfully possessing a gun, a nondrug offense, based on testimony provided pursuant to the immunity agreement
• deciding the government's appeal of a suppression order but declining to entertain a cross-appeal from an order denying the defendant's motion to dismiss an indictment
• noting that an indication of congressional acquiescence is “particularly strong if evidence exists of the Congress’s awareness of and familiarity with such an interpretation”
• “The government is not required to prove that charges are based on evidence derived from a legitimate source wholly independent of immunized testimony if the scope of the grant of informal immunity does not encompass the crimes with which the defendant is charged.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).