Skip to main content
· 1/3/1964

United States v. Lomik

Citations

  • 14 C.M.A. 344
  • 14 USCMA 344
  • 34 C.M.R. 124
  • 1964 CMA LEXIS 310
  • 1964 WL 4977

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the fact that the contracting officer may have disregarded a directive of the ASPR does not ordinarily render the contract a nullity
  • “even had the contracting officer been cognizant of Mr. Coe’s criminal conviction, he would still not have been compelled to make a determination of nonresponsibility ... to [his] subsidiary firm”
  • alleged illegality, based upon the fact that the president of plaintiff’s parent corporation was convicted of fraud in a different government contract, did not void the contract even though the procurement required that the award go to a responsible party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.