United States v. Lock, Alfred

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• absent clearly expressed Congressional intent to the contrary, the plain language should be conclusive
• absent clearly expressed Congressional intent to the contrary, the plain language should be conclusive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hannemann v. Southern Door County School District
  Seventh Circuit· 2012-03-15· cited 106×
• United States v. Berkos
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-09-09· cited 72×
• United States v. Garrett
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-06-10· cited 57×
• United States v. King
  Seventh Circuit· 2007-11-13· cited 45×
• United States v. Hines
  Third Circuit· 2010-12-14· cited 34×
• United States v. Calderon Espinosa
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-06-24· cited 6×
• United States v. Tremayne James
  Third Circuit· 2020-03-09· cited 1×
• United States v. Sanchez, Julio
  Seventh Circuit· 2007-10-19
• United States v. King, Alan R.
  Seventh Circuit· 2007-11-13
• United States v. Garrett, Chaz
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-06-10
• United States v. Berkos, Daniel
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-09-09
• Johnson v. Blitt & Gaines, P.C.
  N.D. Illinois· 2015-07-07

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• City of Chicago v. Morales
  Supreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 1,379×
• American Tobacco Co. v. Patterson
  Supreme Court· 1982-04-05· cited 841×
• United States v. Ortiz, Jose
  Seventh Circuit· 2005-12-12· cited 100×
• United States v. Barbara A. Harris
  Seventh Circuit· 2003-04-08· cited 44×
• United States v. Patrick C. Roy
  Seventh Circuit· 1997-09-29· cited 19×
• United States v. William A. Ellis
  Seventh Circuit· 2006-03-08· cited 18×
• United States v. Moore
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2003-10-17· cited 3×