Skip to main content
· 11/25/1992

United States v. Lloyd Ray Piche, United States of America v. Lloyd Ray Piche

Citations

  • 981 F.2d 706
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 31060

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that sentencing court may not downwardly depart from Sentencing Guidelines in order to eliminate disparate treatment between similarly situated co-conspirators, one of whom was sentenced pursuant to state law conviction
  • noting district court has \considerable discretion in choosing the spe- cific wording of instructions\
  • because it was “not clear” from defendant’s proffer or witness’s testimony that witness lied in earlier, unrelated matter, preclusion of cross-examination as to alleged falsehood did not represent constitutional violation
  • “Because the evidence of character that [the defendant] attempts to admit is not an essential element of a charge, claim, or defense, however, proof of character is limited to reputation or opinion evidence in accord with Rule 405(a).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ervin, Williams, Western, Virginia, Eastern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.