United States v. Littlewind

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The jury was entitled to credit [the government’s medical expert] testimony and to discredit arguably contradictory testimony.”
• “[T]he relative probative value of pri- or crime evidence is increased by the fact that both offenses were associated with the same victim.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[T]he relative probative value of prior crime evidence is increased by the fact that both offenses were associated with the same victim.”
• “[T]he past acts and the presently charged crimes involved intoxication and physical abuse of the same victim, making them quite similar and relatively more probative.”
• “[L]imiting instructions minimize the danger of unfair prejudice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).