United States v. Litho R. Range (91-3619) Eugene Ellington (91-3620)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The record now before us is simply too cryptic to enable us to say with the requisite degree of certainty that the decision to enhance the sentences of the defendants for obstruction of justice is free of error.”
• “At the very least, the appellate record must contain enough detail to satisfy us that the conduct in question was intended to intimidate witnesses . . . [the district court] should describe on the record the indicia that led to this conclusion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).