United States v. Lisyansky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the defendant did not exercise due diligence where “th[e] [new] witness would be called to testify to the sum and substance of what a known witness at the time of trial could have been called to testify about, and who the defense chose not to call.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).