Skip to main content
· 12/31/2002

United States v. Lisa Thomas

Citations

  • 315 F.3d 190
  • 49 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 338
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 27202
  • 2002 WL 31894884

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant’s conduct “does not fall within the ambit of the bank fraud statute when the intention of the wrongdoer is not to defraud or expose the bank to any loss but solely to defraud the bank’s customer”
  • determining a position of trust requires looking beyond job title to consider “real scope of [defendant’s] job”
  • ”[H]arm or loss to the bank must be contemplated by the wrongdoer to make out a crime of bank fraud.”
  • \[H]arm or loss to the bank must be contemplated by the wrongdoer to make out a crime of bank fraud.\
  • “The Government also suggests that mere ‘deceptive conduct’ toward the bank establishes intent to defraud. We disagree.”
  • \The Government also suggests that mere `deceptive conduct' toward the bank establishes intent to defraud. We disagree.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Becker, Roth, Rosenn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.