United States v. Lincoln Gumbs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that § 2(b) is an exception to the general principle that \the essential element of criminal intent must always reside in the person who does the forbidden act\
• “[T]he Supreme Court has held that a defendant generally need not be aware of the existence of a jurisdictional element to be guilty of a federal offense.” (citing United States v. Feola, 420 U.S. 671, 672-73, 95 S. Ct. 1255, 43 L. Ed. 2d 541 (1975
• “[T]he Supreme Court has held that a defendant generally need not be aware of the existence of a jurisdictional element to be guilty of a federal offense.” (citing United States v. Feola, 420 U.S. 671, 672-73, 95 S. Ct. 1255, 43 L. Ed. 2d 541 (1975) and Yermian, 468 U.S. at 75)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).