United States v. Libia Elizalde-Adame

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party cannot “add materials to the record on appeal which were not before the district court”
• holding that arguments raised for the first time in the reply brief are waived
• “[W]e still could not consider the claims because they are based on factual material outside of the record which was never presented to the district court.”
• “[W]e still could not consider the claims because they are based on factual material outside of the record which was never presented to the district court.”
• “The purpose of Rule 10(e) is to . . . allow[] us to review the decision that the trial court made in light of the information that was actually before it[.]”
• “The purpose of [Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure] 10(e

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).