Skip to main content
· 3/6/1986

United States v. Libertad Cruz

Citations

  • 785 F.2d 399
  • 20 Fed. R. Serv. 212
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 22806

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding probable cause for search of drug dealer’s apartment, even though he was not seen using the apartment
  • finding probable cause for search of drug dealer’s search of the apartment shared by Miggins and McDaniels, apartment, even though he was not seen using the apartment
  • “Whether or not Cruz ever met the two streetcomer sellers, they clearly operated within an organization that he managed and organized.” (emphasis supplied)
  • probable cause for search of drug dealer's apartment even though defendant was not seen using apartment
  • “[E]ven if trial counsel had moved to suppress the evidence, there is little likelihood that the motion would have succeeded, and appellant therefore fails to meet the ‘prejudice’ prong of Strickland.”
  • “We will not read into the statute a distinction between salaried ‘employees’ working directly under a ‘kingpin’ and ‘independent contractors’ or ‘franchisees’ who deal only with subordinates.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feinberg, Lum-Bard, Oakes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.