District of Columbia· 4/27/2006
United States v. Libby
Citations
- 429 F. Supp. 2d 27
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23384
- 2006 WL 1109454
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the authority of the Special Counsel is “confined to the narrow objective of accomplishing the specific mandate he was given [by the Acting Attorney General]”
- concluding based on Morrison that special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald was an inferior officer
- discussing the relationship of Edmond to Morrison
- leak of Valerie Plame's CIA affiliation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. LibbyDistrict of Columbia· 2007-06-21· cited 25×
- United States v. LibbyDistrict of Columbia· 2006-05-26· cited 16×
- United States v. LibbyDistrict of Columbia· 2006-11-02· cited 12×
- Estes v. U.S. Department of the TreasuryDistrict of Columbia· 2016-11-28· cited 12×
- United States v. LibbyDistrict of Columbia· 2007-03-01· cited 10×
- In re Grand Jury InvestigationD.C. Circuit· 2018-07-31· cited 9×
- United States v. Concord Mgmt. & Consulting LLCD.C. Circuit· 2018-08-13· cited 5×
- United States v. LibbyDistrict of Columbia· 2006-12-01· cited 4×
- United States v. RoseD. New Mexico· 2008-02-29· cited 2×
- United States v. YoungD. New Mexico· 2008-04-04
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.