United States v. Libby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is axiomatic that even if the defendant and his attorneys had been granted the highest level of security clearances, that fact alone would not entitle them to access to every piece of classified information this country possesses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Al Farekh
  Second Circuit· 2020-04-16· cited 8×
• United States v. Libby
  District of Columbia· 2006-12-22· cited 5×
• United States v. Marzook
  N.D. Illinois· 2006-06-08· cited 5×
• Chekkouri v. Obama
  District of Columbia· 2016-02-01· cited 2×
• Northrop Grumman Corp. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2007-03-28· cited 1×
• Berntsen v. Central Intelligence Agency
  District of Columbia· 2007-09-22
• Bostan v. Bush
  District of Columbia· 2009-11-12
• United States v. Sum of $70,990,605
  District of Columbia· 2015-03-06
• United States v. Mostafa
  S.D. New York· 2014-01-17
• United States v. Lemma
  District of Columbia· 2025-10-03